Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Book
Published: abr. 2006
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1869362456218828804
building Biblioteca Facultad de Medicina
format Book
fullrecord oai:netcat:be-dblil-65 BR1.1 LILACS LILACSEXPRESS MEDLINE S as Internet <i>http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es</i> Los ComitÚs de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurÝdicas de sus informes Legal repercussions of Clinical Ethics Committees reports Rev. mÚd. Chile 134 4 0034-9887 Es En abr. 2006 20060400 8 Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports. Legal and medical reasoning share the same practical nature. Both can have several correct answers to the same situation. Clinical Ethics Committees deliberate about these alternatives and analyze the involved values. Their conclusions are non-compulsory recommendations. They do not replace nor diminish the doctor's personal responsibility. Even though the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports are not binding, they constitute a sort of "expert's opinion", expressed by qualified professionals, who assume their own professional responsibility as advisors. The members' behavior is necessarily subject to constitutional and legal regulations. When judges review the Clinical Ethics Committee's reports, they must realize that their nature is advisory, and also consider them an essential element to reduce the gap between the medical and legal fields. In this way, the problem of increasingly transforming medicine into a legal issue can be prevented.(AU) 2006-06-09 20060609 SCIELO JA FONTE 428553 <d>BIREME_LXP</d> <s>S0034-98872006000400016</s> Couceiro V., Azucena <s1>Universidad Autónoma de Madrid</s1> <s2>Facultad de Medicina</s2> <c>Madrid</c> <p>España</p> Beca I., Juan Pablo <s1>Universidad del Desarrollo</s1> <s2>Facultad de Medicina ClÝnica Alemana</s2> <s3>Centro de BioÉtica</s3> <c>Santiago</c> <p>Chile</p> <f>517</f> <l>519</l> 65
id oai:netcat:be-dblil-65
institution UMSS
publishDate abr. 2006
record_format abcd
spellingShingle Registro ABCD - ID: oai:netcat:be-dblil-65
title Registro ABCD - ID: oai:netcat:be-dblil-65
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es